The Kalkar II Nuclear Power Plant Case

81 BVerfGE 310 (1990)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

The Kalkar II Nuclear Power Plant Case

Germany Federal Constitutional Court
81 BVerfGE 310 (1990)

Facts

Germany’s Federal Nuclear Energy Act included regulations on the licensing procedures for the production of nuclear reactors. Part of that act specified that the states could administer the regulations created by the federal government through state administrative agencies. A nuclear reactor had been in production in the municipality of Kalkar in the state of North Rhine-Westphalia (plaintiff) since the 1970s and had been meeting all prescribed licensing requirements. However, following the Chernobyl disaster in 1986, North Rhine-Westphalia’s state technology minister issued an order to reassess the nuclear reactor’s safety plans before the reactor could be completely installed. The environmental minister for the federal government (defendant) issued an order declaring that the project could continue based on earlier findings that the project was in compliance with safety guidelines. The order went into detail about the previous findings and how safety concerns would still be met, in spite of the Chernobyl disaster. The state government appealed to the Federal Constitutional Court, arguing that the directive of the federal environmental minister was beyond his legal authority.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Mahrenholz, Bӧckenfӧrde, Klein, Graßhof, Kruis, Franßen, Kirchhof, Winter, J.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership