The King v. Dr. Purnell
England and Wales High Court of Justice
96 Eng. Rep. 20 (1748)
- Written by Arlyn Katen, JD
Facts
Dr. Purnell (defendant) was the vice chancellor of Oxford University. The attorney-general alleged that Dr. Purnell neglected his duties as vice chancellor and justice of the peace by not punishing two people who made treasonous comments at Oxford. The king’s counsel (plaintiff) moved for the court to direct the university to permit inspection of its books, records and archives, in order to build the king’s prosecution of Dr. Purnell. The king’s counsel claimed that the king is a visitor of the university with a right to inspect its books. Oxford University contested the ability of “the lowest agent of the Crown” to search its books based upon the king’s general interest in a prosecution of one of the university’s agents.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lee, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.