The Ministry of Religious Affairs, Government of Pakistan v. Dallah Real Estate and Tourism Holding Company

Case No. 09/28533 (2011)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

The Ministry of Religious Affairs, Government of Pakistan v. Dallah Real Estate and Tourism Holding Company

Paris Court of Appeal
Case No. 09/28533 (2011)

Facts

The Ministry of Religious Affairs, Government of Pakistan (the Ministry) (plaintiff) and Dallah Real Estate and Tourism Holding Company (Dallah) (defendant) signed a memorandum in July 1995. In September 1996, Dallah entered into a new agreement with the Trust, which was an entity created by Pakistani presidential decree and which was legally and financially independent from the Pakistan government. The 1996 agreement contained an arbitration clause. The 1996 agreement replaced the memorandum, so that the memorandum was no longer in effect. Shortly after the agreement was entered, two Ministry officials who were not connected to the Trust sent several letters to Dallah about operations under the agreement. In January 1997, the legal existence of the Trust ended because it was not renewed by presidential decree. Later in January 1997, a Ministry official sent a letter to Dallah using Ministry stationery. The letter stated that Dallah had failed to fulfill its obligations under the 1996 agreement and the Ministry considered that failure a repudiation of the 1996 agreement. The dispute was arbitrated, and an arbitral award was issued in favor of Dallah. The Ministry filed a claim in French court seeking annulment of the award. The Ministry argued that the arbitration clause contained in the 1996 agreement was unenforceable against the Ministry and that the arbitral tribunal had incorrectly applied transnational law to determine that it had jurisdiction over the Ministry. The Ministry argued that although it was a party to the 1995 memorandum, the memorandum was replaced by the 1996 agreement involving only Dallah and the Trust, which was an entity fully separate from the government. Therefore, the Ministry asserted, the acts of the Trust could not be considered the acts of the Ministry, and so the Ministry could not be considered part of the 1996 agreement and subject to an arbitral award given under it.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership