The People ex rel. William J. Scott, Attorney General v. George F. Harding Museum
Illinois Appellate Court
374 N.E.2d 756 (1978)
- Written by Robert Cane, JD
Facts
Under the Illinois Charitable Trust Act (the act), the Illinois attorney general (plaintiff) has standing to enforce the terms of a charitable trust. In 1930, George F. Harding incorporated the George F. Harding Museum (museum) (defendant). The articles of incorporation set forth the purpose of the museum, which was educational. Specifically, the museum was for the accumulation and dissemination of knowledge of arts and sciences for the improvement of the mind by operating a museum for the exhibition of art, artifacts, antiques, and other objects. After Harding’s death in 1939, directors of the museum (defendants) oversaw the museum’s operation. The museum was open to the public until 1965, when the collection was moved. The attorney general brought an action under the act against the museum and its directors, alleging that they had violated their duties under the act because the museum was a charitable trust, so its directors were trustees under the act and obligated to comply. The directors filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that they were not trustees under the act and that the act was unconstitutional because it treated schools differently from other charitable trusts. The trial court granted the motion. The trial court found that the directors were not trustees under the act because the museum held property for an educational, not a charitable, purpose but that the act was constitutional. Both sides appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Downing, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.