The People ex rel. William J. Scott, Attorney General v. George F. Harding Museum

374 N.E.2d 756 (1978)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

The People ex rel. William J. Scott, Attorney General v. George F. Harding Museum

Illinois Appellate Court
374 N.E.2d 756 (1978)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

Under the Illinois Charitable Trust Act (the act), the Illinois attorney general (plaintiff) has standing to enforce the terms of a charitable trust. In 1930, George F. Harding incorporated the George F. Harding Museum (museum) (defendant). The articles of incorporation set forth the purpose of the museum, which was educational. Specifically, the museum was for the accumulation and dissemination of knowledge of arts and sciences for the improvement of the mind by operating a museum for the exhibition of art, artifacts, antiques, and other objects. After Harding’s death in 1939, directors of the museum (defendants) oversaw the museum’s operation. The museum was open to the public until 1965, when the collection was moved. The attorney general brought an action under the act against the museum and its directors, alleging that they had violated their duties under the act because the museum was a charitable trust, so its directors were trustees under the act and obligated to comply. The directors filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that they were not trustees under the act and that the act was unconstitutional because it treated schools differently from other charitable trusts. The trial court granted the motion. The trial court found that the directors were not trustees under the act because the museum held property for an educational, not a charitable, purpose but that the act was constitutional. Both sides appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Downing, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership