The People v. Brandon Lance Rinehart
California Supreme Court
377 P.3d 818 (2017)
- Written by Colette Routel, JD
Facts
Brandon Lance Rinehart (defendant) perfected claims to certain minerals found on federal lands in the State of California (plaintiff). When Rinehart used suction dredging to begin extracting those minerals, California brought criminal charges against him for violating state law that temporarily prohibited suction dredging while its environmental effects were being studied. As a defense to the criminal charges, Rinehart argued that California law was preempted by the General Mining Law of 1872 (GML), because the California law created an obstacle to the accomplishment of Congress’s objectives in passing the GML. The district court rejected Rinehart’s preemption argument, and he was convicted. Rinehart appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Werdegar, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.