The Progressive Corporation v. United States

970 F.2d 188 (1992)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

The Progressive Corporation v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
970 F.2d 188 (1992)

KL

Facts

Insurance company the Progressive Corporation (plaintiff) maintained an active investment portfolio. Progressive employed various investment strategies, including trading in a forward conversion, by which Progressive would make three contemporaneous transactions. First, Progressive purchased common stock. Second, Progressive purchased a put option on a similar quantity of the same stock, giving Progressive the option to sell the stock at a designated, fixed price. Third, Progressive purchased a call option on a similar quantity of the same stock, giving Progressive the right to buy the stock at a set price in the future. In doing so, Progressive effectively hedged its initial stock purchase by retaining the right to buy or sell the same amount of stock depending on the stock’s performance. Progressive claimed deductions for dividends it collected from its initial stock purchase under 26 U.S.C. § 246, a provision of the Internal Revenue Code that permitted corporate tax deductions for dividends if the corporation held the stock in question for at least 16 days. After an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) audit, the IRS disallowed the deductions, taking the position that Progressive’s concurrent put options reduced its stock-holding period to zero days because Progressive had a right to sell the stock the entire time it owned the stock. Progressive sued the United States (defendant), and the district court granted Progressive’s motion for summary judgment. The United States appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Milburn, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership