The Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen

ICC-02/04-01/15 (2021)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

The Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen

International Criminal Court
ICC-02/04-01/15 (2021)

Facts

Dominic Ongwen (defendant) was a leader in the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) in Uganda, a group known for its brutal treatment of civilians. At least seven civilian women were abducted and forced to be Ongwen’s “wives.” These women were heavily guarded and would have been killed if they had tried to escape. Ongwen forced the women to have sex with him. At least two of the women became pregnant and gave birth to Ongwen’s children while in captivity. Later, the International Criminal Court (ICC) charged Ongwen with multiple war crimes and crimes against humanity, including the crime of forced pregnancy. At trial, evidence was presented that Ongwen had confined the two women during their pregnancies for the purpose of continuing his crimes against them of forced marriage, torture, rape, and sexual slavery. The trial chamber evaluated whether this evidence established that Ongwen had committed the crime of forced pregnancy separately from his crimes of rape and unlawful detention.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership