The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

882 F.2d 832 (1989)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
882 F.2d 832 (1989)

  • Written by Brett Stavin, JD

Facts

Although the interest payments payable under a fixed-income debt instrument stay the same throughout the life of the instrument, the market value of the instrument changes based on a number of factors. Specifically, the market value of a debt instrument depends on (1) the interest rate of the debt instrument itself; (2) the prevailing market interest rate; (3) the length of the term; and (4) whether prepayment of the debt is allowed. As to market interest rates, if market interest rates decrease relative to the debt instrument, the debt instrument becomes more valuable because the payments due under the instrument generate a higher income stream than what could be obtained in the market. Conversely, if market interest rates increase relative to the debt instrument, the debt instrument becomes less valuable. As to the length of the term, the longer the term of the debt, the more valuable the instrument becomes because there are more payments due under the instrument, meaning a longer income stream. Therefore, as the maturity date of a debt instrument nears, the value of the debt instrument will decrease. As to prepayment, a debt instrument that does not allow prepayment is worth more than a debt instrument that allows prepayment. This is because allowing prepayment can result in the holder of a debt instrument being unable to realize the increased value of a debt instrument in the market. If market interest rates decrease, instead of the debt instrument becoming more valuable, the borrower will be able to just refinance the debt at a better rate. If no prepayment is allowed, the borrower cannot do so, and the value of the debt instrument will be higher. Additionally, some debt instruments have a prepayment penalty designed to compensate the holder of the debt instrument if a borrower decides to refinance the debt. The amount of the prepayment penalty will typically decrease as the maturity date nears because there are fewer interest payments that would be made under the remaining life of the debt.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gibbons, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership