The Queen v. Coney
England and Wales High Court of Justice, Queen’s Bench Division
8 Q.B.D. 534 (1882)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
A makeshift fight ring was set up near a major road, and two men engaged in a prize-fighting match while a crowd watched. Coney, Gilliam, and another laborer (defendants) were walking along the road and went to see why a crowd had gathered. When the three men saw what was happening, they stayed to watch part of the fight. The three men were charged with assault. The charge was based on a theory that (1) the fighters were assaulting each other, (2) the presence of a crowd encouraged the fighters to assault each other, and (3) the men had aided and abetted the assaults by forming part of that crowd. The judge instructed the jury that if the men were part of the crowd and had no suitable excuse for their presence, they had aided and abetted the assaults and were guilty of assault. The jury found that the three men did not aid and abet the assaults but were guilty of assault. On appeal, the men argued that evidence of their mere presence at the fight, without any additional action on their part, was not enough to sustain their assault convictions.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cave, J.)
Dissent (Matthew, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.