The Soering Case

161 Eur. Ct. H. R. (ser. A) (1989)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

The Soering Case

European Court of Human Rights
161 Eur. Ct. H. R. (ser. A) (1989)

SC

Facts

Jens Soering (defendant) was an 18-year-old German citizen. There was evidence that Soering had certain mental issues. The United States charged Soering with two capital murders committed in Virginia. The murders were punishable by death. Soering was arrested in the United Kingdom and jailed pending extradition to the United States. The United Kingdom, having abolished the death penalty, asked the United States to commit to not imposing the death penalty upon extradition. The district attorney in Virginia signed an affidavit stating that if Soering was convicted he would inform the judge of the United Kingdom’s wish that the death penalty not be imposed. Soering applied for a writ of habeas corpus in the United Kingdom, but the courts rejected the petition because the British secretary of state had not yet exercised his discretion to extradite Soering. Soering then petitioned the secretary of state. The secretary of state rejected the petition and ordered Soering’s extradition. Soering filed an application with the European Court of Human Rights, claiming a violation of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which prohibited “inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment.” Specifically, Soering contended that the death row conditions in Virginia violated Article 3. While the proceedings were pending, the United States stated that it would seek the death penalty for Soering.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 777,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership