The State of Florida, by and through Richard W. Ervin, as Attorney General of the State of Florida, et al. v. The Massachusetts Company, a Corporation
Florida Supreme Court
95 So. 2d 902 (1956)

- Written by Kelli Lanski, JD
Facts
The United States battleship the Massachusetts was sunk off the coast of Florida in the Gulf of Mexico in 1922 after being used for target practice. Over the years, it became a popular fishing site due to marine life making homes in and around the shipwreck. In 1956, the Massachusetts Company (TMC) (defendant) secured a navigational permit from the United States Corps of Engineers to recover artifacts from the ship and started the salvaging process by marking the shipwreck’s location in the water with buoys and lines. The State of Florida, by and through Richard W. Ervin as attorney general (Florida) (plaintiff) filed for a temporary injunction and declaration that the Massachusetts belonged to Florida. The court declared that the shipwreck had been abandoned by the United States and that Florida had failed to establish a right of ownership sufficient to overrule TMC’s ownership under the law of abandoned personal property, ruling for TMC. Florida appealed, arguing that the state had adopted English common law holding that abandoned or derelict goods in the sea were the property of the government unless an owner claimed them within a year and a day and that this law applied to determine ownership of the Massachusetts.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Roberts, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.