The Steamboat New World v. King

57 U.S. 469 (1853)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

The Steamboat New World v. King

United States Supreme Court
57 U.S. 469 (1853)

  • Written by Galina Abdel Aziz , JD

Facts

King (plaintiff) was a former waiter on the Steamboat New World (Steamboat) (defendant). In June 1851, the master of Steamboat granted King free passage on the boat from Sacramento to San Francisco. It was a custom practice for the master to allow employees free passage. While en route, a boiler flue exploded and scalded King. King sued Steamboat in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for negligence in admiralty law. Steamboat’s witnesses testified that the boiler was allowed to carry up to 40 pounds of steam and that at the time of the explosion, it was carrying 23 pounds. Steamboat’s principal engineer did not remember how much steam there was. The master did not comment on how much steam was aboard or the speed of the boat. The district court ruled for King, and Steamboat appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Curtis, J.)

Dissent (Daniel, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership