The Superior Oil Company v. Roberts
Supreme Court of Texas
398 S.W.2d 276, 24 O. & G.R. 77 (1966)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
The heirs of Bob Roberts (plaintiffs) owned an undivided one-half interest in a tract of land. Estella Todd (defendant) and James Craven owned the other one-half interest. Todd and Craven each leased their rights to the oil and gas in the land to The Superior Oil Company (Superior) (defendant). Each lease contained a pooling clause stating that Superior would pool the leased interest with nearby lands. Superior offered to enter into a similar lease with the plaintiffs, but the plaintiffs did not accept. The plaintiffs also did not sign the pooling agreement that Superior signed with nearby interest owners. Production was obtained from the pooled unit, but not the land owned by the plaintiffs, Todd, and Craven. The plaintiffs brought suit against Todd and Superior, seeking to recover based on the production on the pooled unit. The plaintiffs argued that the pooling agreement, which included land of which they owned half, effectively made them cotenants with Todd and Craven. The trial court found in favor of the plaintiffs and awarded recovery. The court of civil appeals affirmed. The defendants appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Norvell, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.