The Trial of Sir Walter Raleigh
2 How. St. Tr. 1 (1603)
Sir Walter Raleigh (defendant) was charged with treason in connection with an alleged conspiracy to overthrow and kill the King of England. The prosecution alleged that Raleigh’s co-conspirator was Lord Cobham, who had already confessed to the conspiracy and implicated Raleigh. Cobham was convicted in a separate trial. The prosecution read Cobham’s confession, which was the only evidence against Raleigh, into evidence. Raleigh claimed that Cobham had implicated him only to save his own life. Raleigh sought to cross-examine Cobham about his confession, claiming that if Cobham testified, he would not lie about Raleigh’s involvement in the conspiracy. Raleigh asserted that Cobham’s confession, on its own, was unreliable hearsay.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.