Theatrical Services & Supplies, Inc. v. GAM Products, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
34 Misc. 3d 1224(A) (2012)
- Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Facts
Theatrical Services & Supplies, Inc. (Theatrical) (plaintiff) was a New York company that was in the business of selling theatrical supplies. GAM Products, Inc. (GAM) (defendant) was a California company that made specialty lighting products for use in the entertainment industry. In 2007, Theatrical began negotiations with GAM to become a distributor of GAM’s products on the East Coast. On September 1, 2007, the parties signed a written distributor agreement that gave Theatrical a nonexclusive right to sell GAM’s products to retail end users. The written agreement contained a merger clause, which provided that all agreements between the parties were “contained in this agreement which supersedes and terminates all other agreements between the parties.” According to Theatrical, the parties also separately entered into an oral master-distributor agreement, as evidenced by emails predating September 2007. Under the oral agreement, Theatrical had the right to sell to small East Coast distributors, GAM agreed not to compete with Theatrical for sales to these smaller distributors, and GAM agreed to engage in actions to transition Theatrical into the role of an exclusive master distributor. In reliance on the oral agreement, Theatrical ordered $30,000 worth of GAM’s products, which Theatrical was subsequently unable to sell. Theatrical sued GAM, alleging breaches of the oral and written agreements and fraudulent inducement as to the oral agreement. GAM moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing that Theatrical could not introduce evidence of an oral contract that contradicted the written contract.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Emerson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.