Thibeault's Case

171 N.E.2d 151, 341 Mass. 647 (1961)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Thibeault’s Case

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
171 N.E.2d 151, 341 Mass. 647 (1961)


Blanche Thibeault (plaintiff) was employed as a nurse at a state institution (defendant). Thibeault was engaged in heavy lifting in the girls’ infirmary when she had a heart attack on or around August 31, 1958. Thibeault filed for workers’-compensation benefits for the heart attack on September 9, 1958. Thibeault also claimed that she suffered another heart attack on January 7, 1959, when lifting a tray in the boys’ infirmary. Thibeault’s daughter called someone at the institution after each heart attack to report Thibeault as sick, but she did not report the details of the attacks. The institution’s supervisor knew that Thibeault was sick, and another employee, Generoux, spoke to the supervisor with regard to the incident that occurred on or around August 31 or September 9, 1958. The supervisor had knowledge that Thibeault became sick while working on June 3, 1959, but was unaware that she had suffered a heart attack. At the hearing, Biggine, the institution’s treasurer, testified that Thibeault was examined by the institution’s physician, Dr. Quinn, in April 1959. Thibeault was also examined by Dr. Brooks in May 1959 and subsequently returned to light-duty work until she could no longer work. A member of the Industrial Accident Board (the board) found Thibeault totally incapacitated from September 1 to December 2, 1958, and from January 5 to November 23, 1959. The member found Thibeault had suffered heart attacks around August 31, 1958, January 4, 1959, and June 2, 1959. The member found that the insurer, the commonwealth (defendant), was not prejudiced on the basis that the superintendency had full knowledge of Thibeault’s condition, and the member found that she received adequate medical care following her injuries. The member awarded compensation to Thibeault. The reviewing board adopted the findings. The superior court entered a decree enforcing the board’s decision, and the commonwealth appealed, arguing that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that the commonwealth had knowledge of the injury or that it was not prejudiced by the want of notice or delay in filing the claim.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Cutter, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 735,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 735,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 735,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership