Logourl black

Thomas & Windy City Hemp Development Board v. Chicago Park District

United States Supreme Court
534 U.S. 316 (2002)


Facts

The Chicago Park District (defendant) was responsible for operating public parks and other public property in Chicago. It adopted an ordinance that required a person to obtain a permit in order to “conduct a public assembly, parade, picnic, or other event involving more than fifty individuals,” or to engage in any other activity creating amplified sound. The ordinance provided that applications for permits would be processed in the order in which they were received, and that the Park District was required to either grant or deny the permit within fourteen days of receiving the application unless it decided to extend the decision period for another fourteen days. Applications could be denied based on thirteen different grounds, but the Park District had to clearly set forth its reasons for a denial in writing. Unsuccessful applicants could file written appeals with the Park District within seven days of a denial. Thomas & Windy City Hemp Development Board (TWCHDB) (plaintiff) applied to the Park District on several occasions for permits to hold rallies advocating the legalization of marijuana. The Park District granted some permits and denied others. However, TWCHDB filed suit in district court under 42 U.S.C. §1983 on the grounds that the Park District’s ordinance was unconstitutional on its face. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Park District, and the court of appeals affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Here's why 81,000 law students rely on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 11,513 briefs - keyed to 153 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.
Start Your Free Trial Now