Thomas Kinkade Company v. White

711 F.3d 719 (2013)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Thomas Kinkade Company v. White

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
711 F.3d 719 (2013)

Facts

In the late 1990s, Thomas Kinkade Company (Kinkade) (plaintiff) entered into agreements with Nancy and David White (defendants), making the Whites “signature dealers” of Kinkade’s artwork. The agreements required disputes to be resolved through arbitration. In 2002, Kinkade initiated arbitration, alleging that the Whites had failed to pay for artwork. The Whites counterclaimed for fraud. Each party appointed one arbitrator—Kinkade chose Burton Ansell, and the Whites chose Mayer Morganroth—and together they selected Mark Kowalsky as the neutral arbitrator and panel chair. The arbitration, which spanned nearly five years and 50 hearing days, was marred by misconduct. The Whites’ counsel secretly transmitted live-feed hearing transcripts to a former Kinkade employee, who then suggested cross-examination questions in real time. The Whites withheld key financial records for years. After closing arguments in December 2006, Kowalsky ordered additional briefing and directed the Whites to provide further causation and damages evidence, effectively giving them a chance to fix deficiencies in their case. In early 2007, Kowalsky disclosed that his law firm had been hired for lucrative engagements by both Morganroth and David White. Kowalsky refused to disqualify himself. Soon after, Kowalsky allowed the Whites to submit 8,800 pages of previously withheld financial documents as backup for their damage calculations. In May 2008, the panel issued an interim award granting the Whites $567,300 and summarily denying Kinkade’s uncontested breach-of-contract claim. Then, despite language in the interim award suggesting attorney’s fees were denied, Kowalsky ordered a briefing on fees. In February 2009, the panel issued a final award granting the Whites over $1.4 million in damages, fees, costs, and interest. Kinkade filed a petition in federal district court to vacate the award. The court vacated the final award in its entirety due to evident partiality. The Whites appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kethledge, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership