Thomas M. Chastain

59 T.C. 461 (1972)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Thomas M. Chastain

United States Tax Court
59 T.C. 461 (1972)

JC

Facts

[Editor’s Note: This case can also be found under the title Chastain v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.] Thomas Chastain’s father, Robert, died in 1964 and left Thomas a bequest of $1,000,000, including two mortgages with unrealized gains of $782,909.33. Robert made a few other bequests and directed that all estate taxes be paid from the residue, with the remainder going to a charitable foundation. Robert’s federal estate tax return reported a gross estate of just over $4.5 million, with net estate tax payable of $911,346.85. Meanwhile, Thomas reported a long-term capital gain of $632,402.84 on his 1966 income tax return as income in respect of a decedent for the mortgages, and he claimed a deduction of $439,856.99 for estate taxes attributable to the capital gain. This case regards the manner of calculation of estate tax deduction allowable to Thomas. The parties agreed that a fraction was to be determined, which was the income in respect of a decedent ($632,402.84) received by the taxpayer over all such items ($793,092.06). That fraction was then to be multiplied by the amount of estate tax attributable to the net value for estate purposes of all such items. Thomas argued that he should reduce the gross estate by all of the items of income in respect of a decedent, with a higher residuary gift to charity then calculated. By deducting the income items and increasing the charitable gift, Thomas reduced the estate tax to $359,725.23 and subtracted that from the existing $911,346.85 in estate tax with a resulting $551,621.62 as the estate tax attributable to the items of income in respect of a decedent. That calculation yielded a deduction of $439,856.99. The government disagreed, calculating Thomas’s bequest of $1,000,000 by eliminating those figures of income in respect of a decedent and then removing those same sums from the charitable bequest. This calculation ultimately yielded a taxable estate identical to the actual taxable estate, with no deduction then available.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Raum, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership