From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...
Thomas v. City of Baxter Springs
United States District Court for the District of Kansas
369 F. Supp. 2d 1291(2005)
Facts
Ronald Thomas (plaintiff) authored and published a political editorial that criticized Donna Wixon, the city clerk for the city of Baxter Springs (defendant). After speaking with Robert Myers, who was the city attorney, Wixon filed a criminal complaint that charged Thomas with violating the city’s criminal-defamation ordinance, Baxter Springs Ordinance Number 762, Article 3, § 3.9a (the ordinance). The ordinance stated that “criminal defamation is communicating to a person . . . information, knowing the information is false and with actual malice, tending to expose another living person to public hatred, contempt or ridicule [or] tending to deprive such person of the benefits of public confidence or social acceptance.” The complaint alleged that Thomas published the editorial with actual malice and knowledge it was false. Thomas filed an action in federal court alleging in part that the ordinance was unconstitutional because it was both vague and overbroad. Wixon filed a motion to dismiss Thomas’s claim that the ordinance was unconstitutional for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lungstrum, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 602,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
