Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
T

Thomas v. District of Columbia

407 F. Supp. 2d 102 (2005)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Thomas v. District of Columbia

United States District Court for the District of Columbia
407 F. Supp. 2d 102 (2005)

CS

Facts

Lisa Ann Thomas (plaintiff) brought an administrative appeal on behalf of her disabled son, A.T., against the District of Columbia Public Schools (the district) (defendant) under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The appeal was heard by an impartial-hearing officer. There were some procedural delays caused by the hearing officer, as well as some delays on Thomas’s part. The hearing officer eventually ruled against Thomas and denied her motion for reconsideration of the matter. Thomas appealed the ruling in federal district court. In her appeal, Thomas claimed that the hearing officer was biased, alleging that the procedural delay, denial of her motion for reconsideration, and an error of law made by the hearing officer were all evidence of bias. She also alleged that the hearing officer had conducted ex parte communications with the district and was an employee of the district. Both the district and Thomas moved for summary judgment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kollar-Kotelly, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Disability Law

Key Terms