Supreme Court of Wyoming
714 P.2d 1205 (1986)
Phyllis Thomas (plaintiff) underwent spinal surgery to correct neurological symptoms. Dr. Albert Metz (defendant) performed the surgery. Thomas later developed other neurological symptoms, which she attributed to the surgery. Thomas sued Metz for malpractice in operating on Thomas without medical necessity. Before trial, Metz's two neurological experts read Metz's pretrial deposition, in which Metz defended the surgery's necessity. At trial, both experts testified the surgery was necessary, an opinion the experts said they based on their review of hospital records and pretrial depositions. Thomas's lawyer thoroughly cross examined both experts. The jury returned its verdict for Metz. On appeal, Thomas argued that the trial judge: (1) improperly refused to require the experts to disclose the sources on which they based their opinions, and (2) improperly admitted expert testimony formed in part on statements Metz made in his deposition.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Brown, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.