Thomas v. Sullivan

922 F.2d 132 (2d Cir. 1990)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Thomas v. Sullivan

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
922 F.2d 132 (2d Cir. 1990)

Facts

Gertrude Thomas (plaintiff) and Joseph Thomas lived together for 47 years. In 1978, Gertrude applied to the Social Security Administration (SSA) for wife’s-insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. Joseph submitted a statement attesting that the couple had been married by a clergyman in 1943 after Joseph’s first wife, Janie Mills, died. The SSA approved the benefits, and they automatically converted to widow’s benefits when Joseph died in 1985. However, shortly after Joseph’s death, Mills applied for benefits as Joseph’s widow, submitting a marriage certificate. When the SSA’s records’ search confirmed there was no evidence Joseph and Janie divorced, the SSA determined Janie to be Joseph’s lawful widow and ceased Gertrude’s benefits. Gertrude requested reconsideration, arguing that even if her marriage was invalid, she was nevertheless entitled to benefits as a deemed widow because she believed in good faith the marriage was valid. She claimed that she had obtained a Georgia marriage license, been married by an Atlanta minister, and relied on the minister to file the marriage certificate. Further, she said that Joseph told her he was divorced. The SSA found no evidence that a marriage license had been issued or a marriage certificate had been filed. Consequently, the SSA held that Gertrude was not a deemed widow because such classification applied only to invalid ceremonial marriages, not invalid common-law marriages, and there was no evidence of a ceremonial marriage. Gertrude sued Secretary of Health and Human Services Louis Sullivan (defendant), alleging that treating invalid common-law marriages differently from invalid ceremonial marriages violated equal protection under the Fifth Amendment. The district court disagreed, and Gertrude appealed to the Second Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kearse, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership