Thompkins v. Lil' Joe Records, Inc.

476 F.3d 1294 (2007)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Thompkins v. Lil’ Joe Records, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
476 F.3d 1294 (2007)

Facts

In May 1989, Luther Campbell (debtor) signed Jeffrey Thompkins (plaintiff) to a recording agreement with Campbell’s recording company, Luke Records, Inc. (debtor). The agreement provided that for five years, Thompkins would record albums under the name Poison Clan for production and release by Luke Records. Luke Records received copyrights to the sound recordings and agreed to pay Thompkins royalties on all future sales of the records. Between 1989 and 1994, Thompkins, as Poison Clan, recorded three albums that Luke Records distributed. In March 1995, Luke Records’ creditors filed an involuntary Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition against Luke Records. Campbell subsequently filed a voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition and asked that Luke Records’ Chapter 7 case be converted to a Chapter 11 case. The bankruptcy court agreed and jointly administered the Chapter 11 bankruptcies. The bankruptcy court eventually confirmed a joint reorganization plan and ordered the rejection of all of Campbell’s and Luke Records’ executory (i.e., unperformed) contracts and unexpired leases. As the final step in the reorganization, Luke Records and Campbell assigned all their copyrights to Lil’ Joe Records, Inc. (Lil’ Joe) (defendant). In March 2002, Thompkins sued Lil’ Joe and other entities for copyright infringement based on Lil’ Joe’s alleged exploitation of copyrights allegedly owned by Thompkins in the songs he recorded as Poison Clan. Thompkins asserted that when Luke Records rejected its executory contracts, any copyrights granted to Luke Records under the 1989 agreement had reverted to Thompkins. According to Thompkins, the reversion meant that the copyrights were no longer part of the bankruptcy estate and were not transferred to Lil’ Joe. Lil’ Joe moved for summary judgment, asserting that the rejection of the contracts did not affect ownership of the copyrights by Luke Records’ bankruptcy estate and that the copyrights were transferred to Lil’ Joe during the reorganization. The district court granted summary judgment for Lil’ Joe, and Thompkins appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Tjoflat, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership