Thompson & Green Machinery Co., Inc. v. Music City Lumber Co., Inc.

683 S.W.2d 340 (1984)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Thompson & Green Machinery Co., Inc. v. Music City Lumber Co., Inc.

Tennessee Court of Appeals
683 S.W.2d 340 (1984)

Play video

Facts

Joseph Walker (defendant) was president of Music City Lumber Company, Inc. and Music City Sawmill Company, Inc. (collectively, Sawmill). Walker, purportedly on behalf of Sawmill, purchased a large piece of machinery from Thompson & Green Machinery Company, Inc. (Thompson) (plaintiff). On behalf of Sawmill, Walker signed a promissory note to Thompson for the cost of the machinery. However, Sawmill was not incorporated until the day after the purchase. Sawmill later defaulted on the note and returned the equipment to Thompson. Thompson sold the equipment for less than the amount due on the note and sued Sawmill for the balance. Upon learning that Sawmill was not incorporated on the date of the sale, Thompson amended its complaint to include Walker. Walker argued that Thompson was estopped from denying Sawmill’s corporate existence because Thompson dealt with Sawmill as a corporation and did not intend to bind Walker personally to the promissory note. The trial court entered judgment in favor of Walker, and Thompson appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lewis, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership