Thompson Maple Products, Inc. v. Citizens National Bank
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
234 A.2d 32 (1967)
Thompson Maple Products, Inc. (Thompson) (plaintiff) manufactured bowling pin blanks from maple logs. Thompson’s business model was to purchase logs from timber owners in the surrounding area. The logs would be transported to Thompson’s mill by a few local truckers. When the logs arrived, a Thompson employee would evaluate the quantity and grade of the logs and document that information, along with the owner of the logs, on a scaling slip. Pads of the scaling slips were left in areas readily accessible to any of the truckers. The slip was filled out in duplicate. The procedure was for the Thompson employee who filled out the slip to give the copy to the trucker and deliver the original directly to the Thompson bookkeeper. This was not followed in practice. Rather, the Thompson employee would usually give both copies to the trucker, who would take them to the office. Employees in the Thompson office would then issue checks to the owners of the logs. Thompson employees regularly entrusted these checks to the truckers to be delivered to the owners of the logs. Emery Albers was one of the truckers who transported logs to Thompson. Albers obtained blank slips and forged them to show deliveries of logs that did not occur, using names of local timber owners as suppliers. Albers then obtained checks issued to those timber owners and forged the owners’ signatures. Albers either cashed the checks or deposited them into his personal account. The forgeries were eventually discovered, and Thompson sued its bank, Citizens National Bank (the Bank) (defendant), for paying checks with forged endorsements. The trial court ruled in favor of the Bank, and Thompson appealed to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hoffman, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.