Thompson R-2J School District v. Luke P.
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
540 F.3d 1143 (2008)
- Written by Jody Stuart, JD
Facts
Luke P. (plaintiff) was a child with autism who attended public school from kindergarten through second grade in the Thompson R2-J School District (Thompson) (defendant). Although Luke made progress at school, his autism resulted in severe behavioral problems away from school. Luke was unevenly tempered and displayed inappropriate and sometimes violent behavior at home and in public places. Luke developed sleeping problems, waking up frequently in the night and refusing to sleep in a bed. By first grade Luke was toilet trained at school, but he was unable to transfer this skill to his home and other settings away from school. Out of concern that without intervention Luke’s behavior would become more dangerous as he grew physically, Luke’s parents withdrew Luke from the public school he attended and enrolled him in a private residential program. Luke, through his parents, brought suit against Thompson, seeking reimbursement of Luke’s tuition costs. Because of the difficulty Luke had experienced with generalizing the skills learned in school to his home and other environments, Luke’s parents asserted that Thompson failed to provide Luke with the educational services required by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (act). They also asserted that only a private residential school could provide Luke with an adequate education because of the severity of the manifestations of Luke’s disability. Every fact-finder who had assessed the case found that Luke was making progress in the public-school environment on the educational goals individually formulated for him by Thompson and Luke’s parents.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gorsuch, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.