Thompson v. Hi Tech Motorsports, Inc.

945 A.2d 368 (2008)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Thompson v. Hi Tech Motorsports, Inc.

Vermont Supreme Court
945 A.2d 368 (2008)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Shayne Thompson (plaintiff) went to Hi Tech Motorsports, Inc. (HTM) (defendant) to test-drive a motorcycle. Thompson told the salesperson she had a valid motorcycle driver’s license and experience riding a 200cc-engine motorcycle. Thompson signed a release acknowledging she had prior motorcycle-driving experience, had a valid license, was familiar with the motorcycle to be test-driven, and understood motorcycle operation was inherently dangerous and accepted the risks. Thompson waived any rights to any claims she might have for injuries. Thompson was unable to control the 750cc motorcycle she test-drove, hit a guardrail, and was injured. Thompson sued HTM for negligence. The court denied HTM’s motion for summary judgment because of factual issues regarding sales representations and granted Thompson’s cross-motion for partial summary judgment, finding the release contrary to public policy. The state supreme court granted review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Reiber, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership