Thompson v. San Antonio Retail Merchants Association

682 F.2d 509 (1982)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Thompson v. San Antonio Retail Merchants Association

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
682 F.2d 509 (1982)

Facts

The San Antonio Retail Merchants Association (association) (defendant) provided credit reports to business subscribers. To do so, the association used a computer system that received inputs of certain information and matched it to identifying information. The computer operator had to accept a given information file as related to a particular person. William Daniel Thompson Jr. had a bad credit incident, which was entered into the association’s computer system. But the information was entered without an attendant Social Security number. That file was later mistakenly associated with William Douglas Thompson III (plaintiff). Thompson III later tried to obtain credit from a business. The business ran a credit check on Thompson III using the association’s computer system, and as a result of the incorrectly attributed credit information, denied his request. Thompson III later learned of the wrongly attributed adverse information. Thompson III went to the business at which the bad credit incident occurred, and the business acknowledged that the incident occurred with Thompson Jr. Thompson III then brought this information to the association. Eventually, Thompson III sued the association for violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). The case went to a bench trial. Evidence established that the association did not conduct audits to ensure the accuracy of Social Security numbers associated with reports, which a manager explained was the single most important information in a file. Thompson III also presented evidence that he suffered humiliation and embarrassment from being denied credit and that his family also suffered. The district court awarded Thompson III actual damages and attorney’s fees. The association appealed, challenging liability and damages.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership