Thompson v. United States
United States Supreme Court
155 U.S. 271 (1894)

- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Thompson (defendant) was a 17-year-old Native American boy living in the Creek Nation who did not speak or understand the English language. Charles Hermes and his father Mr. Hermes lived near Thompson and believed that Thompson had abused and killed some of their hogs. Charles and Mr. Hermes had threated to injure or kill Thompson if he came near them or their animals again, and Thompson was aware of these threats. One day Thompson was riding his horse on an errand past a field that Charles and Mr. Hermes were working in. Charles and Mr. Hermes began angrily gesturing at Thompson and arguing with him, although Thompson could not understand what they were saying. Thompson rode away. After completing his errand and realizing that he must ride back past the same field to get home, Thompson decided to arm himself with a gun borrowed from another neighbor. When Thompson was near the field, Charles began shouting at Thompson, and Mr. Hermes moved toward a gun that was nearby. Thompson drew his gun, shot and killed Charles, and then fled, pursued by Mr. Hermes. Thompson was convicted for the killing and appealed. Thompson claimed that the trial judge’s instructions to the jury had erroneously presented the law of self-defense.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Shiras, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.