Thompson v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development

220 F.3d 241 (2000)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Thompson v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
220 F.3d 241 (2000)

Facts

A group of African American public-housing residents (the residents) (plaintiffs) brought suit against the Housing Authority of Baltimore City (the housing authority) (defendant), contending that Baltimore’s public-housing system was racially segregated. The parties later entered into a consent decree. Section XII of the consent decree prohibited the new construction of public housing in areas with high concentrations of racial minorities. Hollander Ridge, a public-housing development owned by the housing authority, was located in an area with a high concentration of racial minorities. The housing authority was aware prior to the consent decree that Hollander Ridge required extensive, very costly repairs. After the consent decree was entered into, the housing authority stated that it would be economically inviable to rehabilitate the Hollander Ridge development, such that new construction of public housing was needed at the Hollander Ridge site. Because new construction of public housing at the Hollander Ridge site would violate Section XII of the consent decree, the housing authority filed a motion seeking to modify Section XII. The district court granted the motion, and the residents appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Traxler, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership