Thomson Printing Machinery Co. v. B. F. Goodrich Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
714 F.2d 744 (1983)
- Written by Megan Schwarz, JD
Facts
On April 10, 1979, Thomson Printing Machinery Company (Thomson) (plaintiff) met with an agent at B. F. Goodrich Company (Goodrich) (defendant) about the purchase of printing machinery. Thomson discussed the sale terms and the price with the agent. Four days later, Thomson sent a purchase order and a check to Goodrich. Both the check and the purchase order contained Thomson’s contact information. The purchase order also contained information about the machinery purchase. Goodrich refused to perform the contract and Thomson sued. The trial court found for Goodrich stating that the contract was unenforceable because the Statute of Frauds applied. Thomson appealed arguing that the “merchants” exception to the Uniform Commercial Code took the contract outside the Statue of Frauds.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cudahy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.