Thomson v. McGinnis
West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals
195 W.Va 465 (1995)

- Written by Darius Dehghan, JD
Facts
Rebecca Thomson (plaintiff) sought to purchase a home. The seller was represented by real estate broker Erma McGinnis (defendant). McGinnis agreed to have the furnace inspected and to certify that it was working. McGinnis asked David Stephens (defendant) to inspect the furnace. McGinnis provided Stephens with a heating-certification form, upon which Stephens certified that the furnace was in working condition. After purchasing the home, Thomson discovered that the furnace was not functioning due to asbestos on the heating pipes. When Stephens went to Thomson’s house to service the furnace, he informed Thomson that he was not certified in heating. Stephens also said that he should not have signed the certification form and that he did so only at the direction of McGinnis. Thomson subsequently brought suit, alleging fraudulent misrepresentation and negligence. The circuit court granted summary judgment against Thomson, and Thomson appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Workman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.