Thornell v. Jones

144 S. Ct. 1302 (2024)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Thornell v. Jones

United States Supreme Court
144 S. Ct. 1302 (2024)

SC

Facts

Robert Weaver, Weaver’s grandmother, and Weaver’s seven-year-old daughter Tisha were killed during an attempt to steal Weaver’s gun collection. Danny Lee Jones (defendant) was convicted of the murders. During sentencing, the trial court found three aggravating circumstances: (1) the commission of multiple murders, (2) that the crimes were motivated by pecuniary gain given the attempt to steal the gun collection, and (3) the fact that Tisha was only seven years old. The trial court found the following mitigating factors: (1) Jones’s long-standing issues with substance abuse, (2) the fact that the abuse may have been caused by genetics and head trauma, (3) that Jones was intoxicated at the time of the murders, and (4) that Jones was abused as a child. The court found that these mitigating circumstances did not outweigh the aggravating circumstances and sentenced Jones to death. Jones filed a postconviction motion claiming ineffective assistance of counsel in that his attorney did not hire an independent neuropsychologist. Jones asserted that he suffered from posttraumatic stress disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, mood disorder, and bipolar depressive disorder. The trial court denied Jones relief, as did the Arizona Supreme Court. Jones filed a petition for habeas corpus in federal district court. The district court denied the petition, finding that any new evidence did not materially alter the information that was given to the sentencing judge. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Alito, J.)

Dissent (Jackson, J.)

Dissent (Sotomayor, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership