Thornhill v. Alabama

310 U.S. 88 (1940)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Thornhill v. Alabama

United States Supreme Court
310 U.S. 88 (1940)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Play video

Facts

An Alabama statute prohibited picketing or loitering near business premises. A union organized a strike at a plant where almost all employees belonged to the union. On the day the plant was scheduled to resume operations, a nonunion employee came to the plant to report to work. Byron Thornhill (defendant) was on the picket line with six or eight other men. Thornhill told the employee the workers were still on strike and did not want anyone to go in to work, and the employee returned home. Thornhill was convicted for violating the picketing statute, even though both the nonunion employee and another witness testified Thornhill acted peacefully and nonthreateningly. Thornhill appealed, challenging the statute as unconstitutionally abridging freedom of speech.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Murphy, J.)

Dissent (Reynolds, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 747,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 747,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 747,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership