Thorogood v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
547 F.3d 742 (2006)
- Written by Tom Syverson, JD
Facts
Thorogood (plaintiff) purchased a clothes dryer from Sears, Roebuck and Co. (Sears) (defendant). Sears advertised the clothes dryer to be made of stainless steel. Part of the dryer drum was not, in fact, stainless steel. Thorogood claimed that the dryer drum rusted and stained Thorogood’s clothes. Thorogood brought a class action under the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act, on behalf of a half-million purchasers of Sears’s dryer in 29 states. The district court granted Thorogood’s motion for class certification, holding that reliance on Sears’s alleged misrepresentation could be presumed on a class-wide basis. Sears appealed the certification of the class.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.