Threatt v. Rushing
Mississippi Supreme Court
361 So. 2d 329 (1978)
Mittie Alice Cooper Rushing Threatt (defendant) owned property that was primarily used for growing timber. Threatt conveyed the property to her three children, Johnny Rushing, Andrew Rushing, and Mittie Foster (plaintiffs) and reserved a life estate on the property. Later, a one-quarter interest in the property was conveyed back to Threatt. The property contained about 1,000,000 board feet of standing timber. Without obtaining permission from the plaintiffs, Threatt cut about 110,000 board feet of the timber from the property, which was worth about $15,000. Threatt claimed that the timber was cut to remove mature trees in order to thin the land, which would allow the smaller timber to grow faster. The plaintiffs sued Threatt, seeking an injunction to prevent any additional cutting of timber and requesting a judgment for the value of the timber that was cut. The plaintiffs asserted that Threatt’s cutting of the lumber constituted actionable waste. The trial court granted the injunction and awarded damages to the plaintiffs. Threatt appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Broom, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 725,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 725,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.