Three Valleys Municipal Water District v. E.F. Hutton & Co.

925 F.2d 1136 (1991)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Three Valleys Municipal Water District v. E.F. Hutton & Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
925 F.2d 1136 (1991)

Facts

In 1986 the cities of Lawndale, San Marino, and Palmdale and the Palmdale Redevelopment Agency (collectively, the cities) (plaintiffs) opened securities accounts with the predecessor of Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc. (Shearson) (defendant) and entered into client agreements. Each of the client agreements contained an arbitration clause and was executed by Clarence Raymond Wood, who worked for the cities in various capacities. Two years later, the cities filed a suit against Shearson in federal district court, alleging that due to Shearson’s wrongful conduct, the cities lost a total of $8.279 million on their investment accounts. Shearson filed a motion to stay the federal proceeding and compel arbitration based on the arbitration clauses in the client agreements. The cities opposed the motion, arguing that the client agreements were void because Wood did not have authority to bind plaintiffs when he signed the agreements. The cities further argued that even if the cities were bound by the arbitration clauses, such clauses did not cover claims arising under the federal securities law. The district court entered an order compelling arbitration of a portion of the cities’ claims. Specifically, in compelling arbitration, the district court held that the question of whether Wood had authority to bind plaintiffs should be submitted to an arbitrator. The cities immediately appealed the order compelling arbitration.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Pregerson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership