Thurman v. City of Torrington
United States District Court for the District of Connecticut
595 F. Supp. 1521 (1984)
- Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Facts
Tracey Thurman (plaintiff) was estranged from her husband, Charles Thurman. They had one child together. Tracey and the child were staying at a home away from Charles (the home). In October 1982, Charles attacked Tracey at the home. The homeowners made a formal complaint to the City of Torrington (defendant) police department to keep Charles off their property. The next month, Charles returned and forcibly removed his child from the home. The police department refused to accept a complaint about Charles’s conduct. A few days later, Charles broke Tracey’s windshield while she was in her car. Charles was arrested, convicted of breaching the peace, and ordered to stay away from Tracey and the home as a condition of his probation. City officers were aware of the court order. Within the next few months, Charles returned to the home and made numerous threats of violence against Tracey. Officers did nothing despite receiving reports of his conduct and Tracey’s pleas for Charles’s arrest. Tracey eventually obtained a restraining order against Charles. The police still refused to arrest or delayed in arresting Charles. Finally, in a June 1983 incident, Charles stabbed Tracey several times outside the home. Further, Charles assaulted and threatened Tracey in the presence of several police officers before he was finally arrested. Tracey sued the city, alleging that the city used an administrative classification, which failed to protect her as a victim of domestic violence in contravention of her constitutional rights. The city moved to dismiss the complaint.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Blumenfeld, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 781,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.