Thurmond v. Prince William Professional Baseball Club, Inc.
Virginia Supreme Court
574 S.E.2d 246 (Va. 2003)
- Written by Brianna Pine, JD
Facts
Donna Thurmond (plaintiff) attended a baseball game conducted by the Prince William Professional Baseball Club, Inc. (the club) (defendant). Spectators entering the stadium were warned of the risk of being struck by batted or thrown objects by signs stating, “Be Alert! Objects batted or thrown into the stands may be dangerous.” The back of each admission ticket also warned that the ticket holder assumed all risks incidental to the game of baseball, including injury from batted or thrown balls. Spectators could request seats in a screened area if they were uncomfortable sitting in unscreened areas. Thurmond, however, was unaware of this option and sat high in the bleachers on the third-base side. Thurmond was aware of the general risks associated with baseball and remained alert throughout the game, watching hitters and batted balls. During the eighth inning, a foul ball was hit toward her. Thurmond observed the ball approaching but was unable to take evasive action due to its speed. The ball struck her on the right side of her face, causing severe injuries. Thurmond filed a negligence claim against the club, alleging that it failed to provide adequate warnings and maintain the stadium in a safe condition to prevent injuries to invitees. The club responded that Thurmond voluntarily assumed the risk of injury by choosing to sit in an unscreened area. The trial court granted summary judgment for the club. Thurmond appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Keenan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

