Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Tidewater Oil Company v. Waller

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
302 F.2d 638 (1962)


Facts

Dennis Waller (plaintiff) was an employee of Spartan Aircraft Company (Spartan), an Oklahoma corporation. Waller traveled to Turkey as part of his employment to do repair work on mobile homes belonging to a pipeline company. While there, Spartan instructed Waller to perform similar repair work at a remote and isolated oil-well drilling site maintained by Tidewater Oil Company (Tidewater) (defendant). Tidewater transported Waller to the drilling site by airplane. The plane crashed, and Waller suffered serious injuries. Waller filed a diversity suit against Tidewater in federal district court in Oklahoma. Waller alleged that the negligent operation of the airplane and unsafe conditions at the airstrip caused his injuries. Additionally, Waller claimed his right to recover was governed by the laws of Turkey, under which Tidewater owed Waller a duty to exercise ordinary care in operating the aircraft and to furnish a reasonably safe landing place. Shortly thereafter, Waller filed a workers’ compensation claim with the Oklahoma Workmen’s Compensation Commission. The commission held Waller’s claim in abeyance pending the outcome of the litigation. Tidewater argued that Waller’s claim was governed by the worker’s compensation law of either Turkey or Oklahoma, and that the Oklahoma court lacked jurisdiction to hear the matter. At trial, Waller presented no evidence of Turkish law applicable to the facts. The district court concluded that the laws of Turkey permitted recovery on Waller’s claim as if the injury had occurred in Oklahoma. The jury held in favor of Waller. Tidewater appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Murrah, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.