Tillman v. Vance Equipment Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
286 Or. 747, 596 P.2d 1299 (1979)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
Vance Equipment Company (Vance) (defendant) was a used-equipment dealer. Durametal asked Vance to find a crane for Durametal to purchase. Vance found a 24-year-old crane that looked suitable. Durametal inspected and approved the crane. Vance purchased the crane and resold it to Durametal, marking the transaction “as is.” Buddy Tillman (plaintiff), a Durametal employee, was assigned to grease and operate the crane. While Tillman was greasing the gear, his hand was drawn into the gears and injured. Tillman sued Vance for his injuries based on the theory of strict liability in tort, alleging that the crane was defectively designed because it could not be greased properly without removing the protective gear cover and Vance failed to warn of the danger. The trial court found for Vance because the crane was used and was sold “as is.” Tillman appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Denecke, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.