Time Inc. v. Bernard Geis Associates
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
293 F. Supp. 130 (1968)
- Written by Sarah Holley, JD
Facts
Abraham Zapruder captured President John F. Kennedy’s assassination on home video and sold the film to Life magazine, a division of Time Inc. (plaintiff). Parts of the film were printed in several issues of the magazine. The government heavily relied on the Zapruder film during its investigation of the assassination and included numerous frames from the Zapruder film in its final report, known as the Warren Report. Convinced the report was incomplete, Josiah Thompson (defendant) wrote a book entitled Six Seconds in Dallas that studied the assassination and presented his own explanation of the murder. The book contained a number of so-called sketches that were in fact copies of parts of the Zapruder film. Before Thompson hired an artist to produce these sketches, Thompson became a consultant to Life and photographed frames from the Zapruder film without authorization. Life repeatedly denied Thompson permission to use the photographs in his book because Life did not permit use of any part of the Zapruder film as a matter of course, except for its own magazine and publications. Time brought suit for infringement after Bernard Geis Associates and Random House, Inc. (publishers) (defendants) published and distributed the book containing the infringing sketches to the public.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wyatt, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.