Tingley-Kelley v. Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
677 F. Supp. 2d 764 (2010)
- Written by Ann Wooster, JD
Facts
Kimberley Tingley-Kelley (plaintiff) applied six times for admission to the University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine (vet school) and was rejected each time. During two interviews for admission, members of the admissions committee made comments, asked questions, and took written notes about Tingley-Kelley’s status as the mother of young children and the wife of an active Air Force service person before making a decision the same day to deny admission. Tingley-Kelley brought an action in the district court against the vet-school trustees (defendants) and claimed discrimination on the basis of gender in the vet school’s admissions process in violation of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. In particular, Tingley-Kelley argued that the comments, questions, and notes of the admissions-committee members regarding the difficulty of handling both graduate school and childcare responsibilities amounted to direct evidence of disparate treatment on the basis of gender in violation of Title IX. The vet-school trustees moved for summary judgment on this claim.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Pratter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.