Todd v. Krolick
Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division
466 N.Y.S.2d 788 (1983)
James Todd (plaintiff) operated a business that provided coin-operated laundry machines to apartment complexes. In 1979, Todd entered an agreement with Monarch Associates (Monarch) to install and maintain laundry machines in Monarch’s apartment complex. The contract was for a period of 10 years. The contract specifically provided that it was binding on the heirs, successors, and assigns of the parties, and that the contract rights would not be disturbed by any change in ownership. In 1980, Monarch transferred the property to Marine Midland Bank (Marine). In 1981, Marine sold the property to Ronald Krolick and others (defendants). Marine told the defendants that there was no existing agreement concerning the laundry machines located at the apartment complex. The defendants asked Todd several times to remove the machines. In response, Todd sued to prevent removal of the laundry machines during the rest of the 10-year contract term. The trial court found for Todd and granted a preliminary injunction to prevent removal of the machines. The defendants appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Memorandum Decision)
Dissent (Levine, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.