Tompkins v. 23andMe, Inc.

2014 WL 2903752 (2014)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Tompkins v. 23andMe, Inc.

United States District Court for the Northern District of California
2014 WL 2903752 (2014)

Play video

Facts

23andMe (defendant) was a personal genetics company that offered customers hereditary information from a genetic sample. A hyperlink to 23andMe’s terms of service appeared at the bottom of many of 23andMe’s web pages. Customers could enter their payment information and purchase DNA kits online without seeing the terms of service. After purchasing a DNA kit, in order to send in a DNA sample and receive genetic information, customers were required to create an account. The account creation page required customers to check a box affirming that they had read and agreed to the terms of service. Multiple customers (plaintiffs) filed class-action complaints against 23andMe, alleging a variety of claims. 23andMe filed a motion to compel arbitration, citing the arbitration clause in the website’s terms of service. The customers argued that they lacked adequate notice regarding the terms of service. Each customer in this action created accounts and registered their DNA kits online. The case was heard in federal court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Koh, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 744,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership