Torres v. Arnco Construction, Inc.
Florida District Court of Appeal
867 So. 2d 583 (2004)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Arnco Construction, Inc. (Arnco) (defendant) entered into a construction contract in Florida with Javier Torres (plaintiff), a New York resident. Subsequently, Arnco filed a breach-of-contract action against Javier. Arnco’s New York process-server made multiple unsuccessful attempts to serve process on Javier at his New York City apartment. In an affidavit-of-service, the New York process-server stated that Javier’s neighbors verified Javier lived in that apartment but that Javier travelled frequently and spent significant time in Florida with his mother, Gregoria Torres. After several unsuccessful service attempts in New York, Arnco engaged a Florida process-server to effect service-of-process on Javier via substituted-service on Gregoria. Upon being served, Gregoria assured the Florida process-server that Javier would be home soon and that she would ensure Javier got the papers. After several months with no response from Javier, the trial court issued a default-judgment against Javier. After learning about the default-judgment from Gregoria’s attorney, Javier moved to vacate the default-judgment, arguing that the Florida court did not have jurisdiction over him because (1) he never received service-of-process; and (2) the substituted-service effected on Gregoria in Florida was invalid because Gregoria’s Florida home was not Javier’s usual place of abode. The trial court conducted a hearing on the motion-to-vacate; however, the hearing was not an evidentiary hearing because the court did not permit the introduction of live testimony or additional evidence. The trial court denied Javier’s motion to vacate. Javier appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Monaco, J.)
Dissent (Griffin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.