Torres v. Mukasey
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
551 F.3d 616 (2008)
Pedro Flores Torres (plaintiff), a native and citizen of Honduras, sought from the United States government (defendant) asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. Upon finding that Torres’s evidence lacked credibility, the Immigration Judge (IJ) denied his request. The IJ based this decision on information gathered in a hearing in which the IJ played an overactive role, demonstrated impatience, engaged in improper lines of questioning, and relied on personal knowledge beyond the facts in the record. Additionally, in reaching his decision, the IJ relied on his own speculations regarding Torres’ family history as the nexus for his mistreatment. Torres appealed the IJ’s decision, and the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) summarily affirmed. Torres further appealed his case in federal court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Kanne, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.