From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...
Tory v. Cochran
United States Supreme Court
544 U.S. 734 (2005)
Johnnie Cochran (plaintiff) sued Ulysses Tory (defendant) for defamation. Cochran sought an injunction preventing any further defamation. The trial court found that Tory engaged in an extensive pattern of defamation, including both libel and slander, against Cochran. Tory used this false speech to extort money from Cochran in exchange for ceasing the speech. The trial court granted Cochran a permanent injunction, enjoining Tory and his agents and representatives from picketing, displaying signs, and saying anything verbally about Cochran or his law firm in any public forum. The California Court of Appeal affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari. After oral argument before the Supreme Court, Cochran passed away.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Breyer, J.)
Dissent (Thomas, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 605,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 605,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.