Town & Country Estates Association v. Slater
Montana Supreme Court
740 P.2d 668 (1987)
- Written by Jennifer Flinn, JD
Facts
The Town & Country Estates Association (TCE) (plaintiff) was a subdivision that contained both single-family homes and vacant lots. All deeds to TCE lots incorporated a Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions. Article V of the Declaration required that new construction in TCE be approved by the Design Review Committee (DRC) and be in harmony of external design to surrounding homes. There was no minimum value contained in Article V, but it required TCE homes to have a minimum of 2,400 square feet and have a shake roof. The homes in TCE had unique external designs in a variety of styles. Slater (defendant) purchased a lot in TCE and submitted their proposed home, which had wood siding, a shake roof, and 2,600 square feet, for approval to the DRC. The DRC rejected Slater’s proposed home, which would be worth approximately $135,000, stating that it did not conform to the general tone of the area and recommended that Slater propose a home closer to the $200,000 price range in order to align with surrounding homes. Though the proposed home was not approved, Slater began construction on the home. TCE obtained a temporary restraining order against Slater’s construction. Slater resubmitted his proposed home for approval, but it was once against rejected by the DRC because it was not in harmony of external design to surrounding homes. The trial court granted TCE a permanent injunction against Slater’s construction of his proposed home, and Slater appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Turnage, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.